1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 83 F.Supp.
  5. 83 F.Supp. 840 (1949)
 

ESTOPPEY v. UNITED STATES

No. 46698.

83 F.Supp. 840 (1949)

ESTOPPEY v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

May 2, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee Warren James, of New York City (James and Fields, of New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff.

Eugene R. Weisbender, of Washington, D. C., and H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen. (T. Hayward Brown, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

HOWELL, Judge.

Plaintiff filed his petition herein embracing two separate causes of action. The first is based upon the Air Corps Act of July 2, 1926, 10 U.S.C.A. § 310(i), under which plaintiff claims $400,000 as compensation for the alleged use, by the National Cash Register Company for the Air Corps, of drawings, designs, prototype, suggestions and improvements of and in bombsights allegedly invented by him. The second cause of action is based upon the Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases