1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 47 So.2d
  5. 47 So.2d 788 (1949)
 

ROOSEVELT v. KARST

47 So.2d 788 (1949)

ROOSEVELT et ux. v. KARST, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

On Rehearing August 1, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Arthur Yergey, Orlando, for appellants.

Pringle & Pringle, Leesburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

On Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to an order granting a rehearing, the court has reconsidered the case and, being now fully advised in the premises, it is our conclusion that we should adhere to our former opinion and judgment entered herein.

It is so ordered.

ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases