UNITED STATES v. WARD

No. 197, Docket 21253.

173 F.2d 628 (1949)

UNITED STATES v. WARD.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

April 7, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pedro Gotay, of New York City (Morris Goldknopf, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

John F. X. McGohey, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Roy Cohn, Bruno Schachner and Clarke S. Ryan, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and CHASE and FRANK, Circuit Judges.


FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Defendant claims that the statement taken by the F. B. I. agent was inadmissible, because the agent admitted eliminating from the statement whatever he thought immaterial. But the agent testified that he read the statement, as he had written it, to the defendant, and that the defendant signed the statement. If any material part was eliminated, defendant had an opportunity to cross examine the agent or to introduce the omitted part. It was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases