STEINBRUGGE v. STEINBRUGGE


2 N.J. 77 (1949)

65 A.2d 606

JOAN B. STEINBRUGGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. E. DONALD STEINBRUGGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 18, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max M. Albach (Messrs. Ruback & Albach, attorneys) argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Harry Kalisch (Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch, attorneys) argued the cause for the respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

The appeal is from a decree nisi in divorce awarded to the wife for extreme cruelty under R.S. 2:50-2.

We find that the proofs do not sustain the decree.

The marriage was celebrated on June 11, 1941, following an elopement. Petitioner had completed her first year at college; and defendant was pursuing the study of the law. There was no announcement of the marriage until August following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases