LINDLEY, District Judge.
Defendant appeals from a judgment holding valid and infringed Winkel patent 2,051,063, August 18, 1936, and Evans and McDonough reissue patent 22,660, August 7, 1945. It contends that neither patent is valid and that if either is valid, defendant has not infringed.
Each patent has to do with the art of hair curling, especially that involved in creating "permanent" waves. Needless to say, by the very nature of things, this art is of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.