1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 82 F.Supp.
  5. 82 F.Supp. 687 (1949)
 

SUN COSMETIC SHOPPE v. ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORP.

82 F.Supp. 687 (1949)

SUN COSMETIC SHOPPE, Inc. v. ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORPORATION. MIRROR COSMETIC SHOPPE, Inc. v. ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORPORATION.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 9, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Siegel, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Townley, Updike & Carter, of New York City (J. Howard Carter and John S. Bainbridge, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

COXE, District Judge.

These are motions by the defendant, prior to answer, for summary judgment dismissing both of the above actions on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter. The motions are based upon the amended complaints and supporting affidavits, and are opposed by affidavits of the presidents of the plaintiffs. The papers in the two cases are identical, except for the names...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases