PHILIP A. HUNT CO. v. MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS

No. 10, Docket 21267.

177 F.2d 583 (1949)

PHILIP A. HUNT CO. v. MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided October 28, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. A. Stickney, New York City, George I. Haight, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Mock & Blum, New York City, Asher Blum, New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

Judge Byers has stated the facts in this cause with a completeness which makes unnecessary any restatement by us; his opinion is reported,1 and we shall discuss the points raised upon the appeal, assuming an acquaintance with its contents. Moreover, we shall confine our discussion to whether the claims in suit are too broad, and whether the patent was forfeited by prior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases