PER CURIAM.
The only questions raised by the petitioner in this case are whether the Tax Court erred in finding as a fact that petitioner had acquired from Holland Engineering Company a contract between that company and E. H. Heckett giving the company, its successors and assigns, the right to the free use of Heckett's patents and whether the court erred in refusing to grant petitioner's motion for rehearing so as to permit the introduction of additional, but not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.