PER CURIAM.
The District Judge heard full evidence, which was in conflict, and held that no request for appointment of counsel was made in the State court trial. He held also that the real question was whether the petitioner for habeas corpus, who undertook to represent himself in the trial, in view of his age, education, experience and circumstances, received due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment of the federal Constitution as interpreted and applied...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
