PER CURIAM.
On this appeal from his conviction in the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania the appellant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to justify his conviction, and that the trial judge erred in the admission of certain evidence and in permitting the jury to infer criminal intent from the facts as proved. We have carefully examined these contentions in the light of the record and find them to be wholly without merit.
Accordingly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
