1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 172 F.2d
  5. 172 F.2d 535 (1949)
 

NEVINS v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION

No. 10686.

172 F.2d 535 (1949)

NEVINS v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

February 7, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. G. Windom, of Columbus, Ohio (R. J. O'Donnell and L. G. Windom, both of Columbus, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Carl Tangeman, of Columbus, Ohio (Carl Tangeman, of Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, all of Columbus, Ohio, and Desmond FitzGerald, of Spence, Hotchkiss, Parker & Duryee, all of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The district judge decided in favor of the defendant, Curtiss-Wright Corporation, in this court action brought by James Wilson Nevins under section 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, Section 308(e), Title 50 U.S.C.A., and Nevins has appealed.

When inducted into the United States Army on September 30, 1942, the appellant was working as a tool maker in the employ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases