COLGATE CO. v. LABOR BOARD

No. 47.

338 U.S. 355 (1949)

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 5, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ricardo J. Hecht argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum.

Ruth Weyand argued the cause for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Bernard Dunau.

Mathew O. Tobriner filed a brief for the International Chemical Workers Union, A. F. of L., respondent.


MR. JUSTICE MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question we have here is whether a closed-shop contract, entered into and performed in good faith, and valid in the state where made, protects an employer from a charge of unfair labor practices under the National Labor Relations Act.1

Petitioner was found by the National Labor Relations Board to have violated §§ 8 (1) and 8 (3) of the Act.2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases