1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 56 S.E.2d
  5. 56 S.E.2d 602 (1949)
 

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. v. BOWMAN

No. 673.

56 S.E.2d 602 (1949)

231 N.C. 332

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. v. BOWMAN et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Y. Arledge, Raleigh, and Varser, McIntyre & Henry, Lumberton, for plaintiff appellant.

McKinnon & McKinnon and Malcolm B. Seawell and McLean & Stacy, Lumberton, for defendant appellees.

BARNHILL, Justice.

The exception to the order permitting defendants to amend their answer is without merit. Whether the amendment should be allowed rested within the sound discretion of the court below. G.S. § 1-163; Bank of Ashe v. Sturgill, 223 N.C. 825, 28 S.E.2d 511; Hughes v. Oliver, 228 N.C. 680, 47 S.E.2d 6; Hatcher v. Williams, 225 N.C. 112, 33 S.E.2d 617. Its ruling thereon is not subject to review on appeal except for palpable abuse. Gordon v. Pintsch...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases