HOROWITZ v. BURSENS


198 Misc. 399 (1949)

Abraham Horowitz, Doing Business as The Jarvis Company, Respondent, v. Audomarus Bursens, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 30, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Zucker and William I. Cohen for appellant.

Herman Frankel for respondent.

HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and EDER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The evidence establishes that the television set sold to defendant did not function properly as to channel 5 and was not of merchantable quality and was inadequate for the use to which the defendant had given notice that it was to be applied and this constituted a breach of the implied warranty of merchantable quality provided in subdivision 2 of section 96 of the Personal Property Law (Ryan v. Progressive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases