1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 86 F.Supp.
  5. 86 F.Supp. 506 (1949)
 

CARL GUTMANN & CO. v. ROHRER KNITTING MILLS

Civ. No. 8620.

86 F.Supp. 506 (1949)

CARL GUTMANN & CO., Inc. v. ROHRER KNITTING MILLS, Inc., et al.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

September 29, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Ray Bernstein, New York City, Oscar Brown, Samuel Kagle, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Goldman & Jobrack, New York City, Conlen, La Brum & Beechwood, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed its amended complaint consisting of four causes of action for breach of contract with copy of a written agreement attached thereto as an exhibit. Defendants have filed their motion to dismiss the first, second and third causes of action because the amended complaint fails to state any claims against defendant Rohrer Knitting Mills, Inc., upon which relief can be granted substantially for the following reasons:

1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases