1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 34 Cal.2d
  5. 34 Cal.2d 525 (1949)
 

MOORE v. BELT

Docket No. L.A. 20994.

34 Cal.2d 525 (1949)

212 P.2d 509

H.T. MOORE, Appellant, v. ELMER BELT, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 16, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Briggs Howarth and Walter R. Trinkaus for Appellant.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Balthis as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Fulcher & Wynn, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Phillip C. Sterry for Respondent.

Hartley F. Peart, Gus L. Baraty, Howard Hassard, George A. Smith, Alan L. Bonnington, Reed & Kirtland and Louis J. Regan as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

SHENK, J.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment on a verdict for the defendant in an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice. The appeal is on a settled statement. Due to an admitted conflict in the testimony it is not contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. The plaintiff's principal assignments are that the court committed prejudicial error in the instructions on the issue of negligence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases