1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 193 Md.
  5. 193 Md. 366 (1949)
 

LEWIS v. BALTIMORE TRANSIT CO.

[No. 176, October Term, 1948.]

193 Md. 366 (1949)

66 A.2d 686

LEWIS ET AL. v. BALTIMORE TRANSIT CO.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 9, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Duke Avnet and Edgar Paul Boyko, for appellants.

Walter V. Harrison, with whom was Philip S. Ball on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before MARBURY, C.J., DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.

MARBURY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question in this case is whether the jury should have been permitted to consider the two cases involved in this appeal (tried together), or whether the trial court was correct in directing it to enter a verdict in favor of the defendant in each case. It is an appeal by the plaintiffs, one of whom sued for personal injuries, and the other for damages to his automobile.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases