MALILA v. MEACHAM


187 Or. 330 (1949)

211 P.2d 747

MALILA v. MEACHAM

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed November 15, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T.H. Ryan argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Ryan & Pelay, of Portland.

Frank S. Senn argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Senn, Recken & Recken, of Portland.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, ROSSMAN, HAY and PAGE, Justices.


LUSK, C.J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant, a dentist, for malpractice, and recovered a judgment based upon the verdict of the jury. Upon motion of the defendant the court entered an order setting the verdict aside and granting a new trial. From that order the plaintiff has appealed.

The principal issue of fact developed in the testimony was whether the defendant was negligent in extracting two of plaintiff's teeth at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases