WINGET v. WINGET

No. 33500.

202 Okla. 298 (1949)

213 P.2d 288

WINGET v. WINGET.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 27, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shilling & Shilling, of Ardmore, for plaintiff in error.

Frederick J. Hoyt, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.


HALLEY, J.

The parties occupy the same position in this court as they did in the court below, so will be referred to as in the lower court.

In 1941, the defendant was married to a man named Hickey and they lived in or near Bakersfield, Calif. In October of that year, she came to Stonewall, Okla., her old home, for a visit. There she met the plaintiff, who was at that time married. Plaintiff and defendant cohabited from October until December 5, 1941, according...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases