FUR DRESSERS UNION v. FUR DRESSERS GUILD

Civ. 52-384.

87 F.Supp. 400 (1949)

FUR DRESSERS UNION, LOCAL NO. 2, C. I. O. et al. v. FUR DRESSERS GUILD, Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 8, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Markewich, Rosenhaus & Markewich, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Max Zucker, New York City, for defendant.


IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., in an action for a declaratory judgment pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201. The jurisdiction of the Court over the cause of action is founded on Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 156, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 141 et seq., 185.

There are no questions of fact in dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases