BROWN & BIGELOW, INC. v. BORISH


165 Pa.Super. 308 (1949)

Brown & Bigelow, Inc., Appellant, v. Borish.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

July 15, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert M. Hankin, with him Norman H. Abrahamson and Meyer, Lasch, Hankin & Poul, for appellant.

Benjamin A. Katz, for appellee.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, RENO, DITHRICH, ARNOLD and FINE, JJ. (ROSS, J., absent.)


OPINION BY FINE, J., July 15, 1949:

This appeal is from an order of the court below making absolute a rule to open a judgment entered for want of an answer. The appellant company, Brown & Bigelow, complains, inter alia, that Honey Borish, apellee, failed to set forth a valid and meritorious defense in support of his rule and because of that default and of laches the court erred in granting the prayer to open.

Appellant instituted suit in assumpsit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases