1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 1 N.J.
  5. 1 N.J. 448 (1949)
 

MORRISSEY v. MORRISSEY

1 N.J. 448 (1949)

64 A.2d 209

HARRY A. MORRISSEY, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, AND JEFFREY TUCKER MORRISSEY, AN INFANT, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, ANNA TOFT MORRISSEY, COMPLAINANT, v. JANICE TUCKER MORRISSEY (FALSELY CALLED JANICE TUCKER MORRISSEY STEIKER) AND SIDNEY G. STEIKER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 28, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Morris N. Hartman argued the cause for complainant-appellant (Mr. Dougal Herr, attorney).

Mr. Max Mehler argued the cause for defendant-respondent Sidney G. Steiker (Messrs. Gross, Blumberg, Mehler & Goldberger, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

Appellant Harry Morrissey and respondent Janice were married and a child was born. Morrissey went to war; Janice went to Reno and secured a divorce. She immediately married Steiker and had a child by him. A change of mind brought about a reconciliation with Morrissey and she is now back living with him. The marital status became entangled and embarrassing and in an attempt to adjudicate and maneuver it within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases