1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 187 Or.
  5. 187 Or. 253 (1949)
 

MONGER ET UX. v. DIMMICK ET AL.

187 Or. 253 (1949)

210 P.2d 929

MONGER ET UX. v. DIMMICK ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 25, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.L. Whipple, of Roseburg, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Orcutt & Long, of Roseburg.

Louis Hoffman, of Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Bailey & Hoffman, of Eugene.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, ROSSMAN, BAILEY, HAY and PAGE, Justices.

HAY, J.

On January 7, 1944, the plaintiffs, as vendors, entered into a contract in writing with the defendant Carrol C. Dimmick, doing business as Dimmick Logging and Lumber Company, as purchaser, for the sale of all of the merchantable timber upon certain lands belonging to plaintiffs in Douglas County, Oregon. The agreed price was to be $1.50 per M. board feet for red and yellow fir and ponderosa pine, $5.00 per M. board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases