1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 86 F.Supp.
  5. 86 F.Supp. 336 (1949)
 

LORAINE v. COASTWISE LINES

No. 24518.

86 F.Supp. 336 (1949)

LORAINE v. COASTWISE LINES, Inc., et al.

United States District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

July 14, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fitz-Gerald Ames, Sr., San Francisco, California, for libelant.

John H. Black, Edward R. Kay, San Francisco, California, for respondent Coastwise Lines, Inc.

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, San Francisco, California, for respondent Mitchell Stevedoring Co.

ERSKINE, District Judge.

I am of the opinion that the plaintiff under the applicable law and under the facts is not entitled to recover in this action. It is plaintiff's contention that he is entitled to recover upon two theories:

1. Under the general maritime law, because his injury, he claims, was brought about by the unseaworthiness of the vessel upon which he was employed at the time of his claimed injury; and

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases