AUCHINCLOSS v. CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST CO.


136 Conn. 266 (1949)

NINA G. AUCHINCLOSS ET AL. v. CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST COMPANY ET AL., TRUSTEES (ESTATE OF EMMA B. AUCHINCLOSS)

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 14, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold S. Lynton, of the New York bar, with whom were Philip Reich and, on the brief, Jack M. Ginsberg, of the New York bar, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Sanford Stoddard, with whom were Bradford Boardman and, on the brief, Alvin C. Breul, Jr., for the appellees (defendants).

MALTBIE, C. J., BROWN, JENNINGS, ELLS AND DICKENSON, JS.


MALTBIE, C. J.

In this action, two grandchildren of Emma Brewster Auchincloss seek a declaratory judgment as to their right to have the income of a trust created by her will expended for their benefit and a direction that this be done, and their mother is seeking an order that the trustees reimburse her from income in their hands for money she has disbursed for the grandchildren. Because of the absence of certain parties, the trial court treated the action solely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases