ARSHT v. HATTON

No. 9689.

172 F.2d 220 (1949)

Rita ARSHT, Plaintiff, v. Clarence HATTON, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Norman BUNIN, Third-Party Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided January 6, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tood Daniel, of Philadelphia, for appellant.

S. Samuel Arsht, of Wilmington, Del. (Alexander L. Nichols and Morris, Steel, Nichols & Arsht, all of Wilmington, Del., and Louis H. Wilderman and Melvin A. Bank, both of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The questions presented by the appeal at bar are so clearly those of fact that it is unnecessary to write an extended opinion in the instant case. There was ample evidence in the record from which the jury was entitled to find that the defendant was negligent. We can perceive no sound basis for concluding that the trial judge erred in permitting evidence to go to the jury as to the position of the debris and of the cars after the collision. The evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases