MATTER OF TATE v. ESTATE OF DICKENS


276 A.D. 94 (1949)

In the Matter of the Claim of Daniel Tate, Respondent, v. The Estate of Fred Dickens, Deceased, Doing Business as Dickens Realty Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

November 16, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph H. Broderick and William Merritt for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum and Gilbert M. Landy of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Solomon Popkin for claimant-respondent.

FOSTER, P. J., SANTRY and BERGAN, JJ., concur with HEFFERNAN, J.; DEYO, J., dissents, in an opinion.


HEFFERNAN, J.

On April 7, 1944, the employers, Fred Dickens, since deceased, and his wife, Effie Dickens, were the owners of an apartment building and rooming house in the city of New York. Claimant was employed by them as a janitor. As part of his duties he was required to look after the furnace in the building.

Claimant asserts that on April 7, 1944, while he was breaking up clinkers in the furnace with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases