LUTZ v. RYNO


1 N.J. 363 (1949)

63 A.2d 881

CHARLES G. LUTZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. H. WILSON RYNO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 14, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lloyd G. Beatty argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Egner & Beatty, attorneys; Mr. Joseph Weintraub on the brief).

Mr. Abraham M. Herman argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.

The former Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the District Court of the Essex County Judicial District. The issue was heard by the District Court Judge, sitting without a jury. No transcript of the testimony was made.

The suit was based on an oral contract of employment for commissions allegedly earned before its cancellation. The state of case settled by the Court sets forth that the plaintiff testified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases