REED v. COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION

Nos. 31770 and 31771.

152 Ohio St. 207 (1949)

REED, APPELLANT, v. COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES. HOWELL, APPELLANT, v. COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 9, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Butler, Summer & Hoffman, for appellants.

Mr. James S. Peterson, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for appellees.


TAFT, J.

Appellants' complaints are that these cottages were classified as real estate instead of personal property for purposes of taxation. There is no contention that the cottages could not be taxed at all because they were located on land leased from the state. Cf. City of Toledo v. Jenkins et al., Bd. of Tax Appeals, 143 Ohio St. 141, 54 N.E.2d 656.

State lands adjacent to Buckeye Lake are leased as provided in Sections 471, 13965, 13966...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases