SORG v. ROYAL


41 So.2d 317 (1949)

SORG v. ROYAL.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

Rehearing Denied July 22, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paty, Warwick & Paul, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

W.E. Roebuck and Earnest, Lewis & Smith, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


CHAPMAN, Justice.

On this appeal the contention is made that the jury's verdict for the plaintiff-appellant in the sum of $1,500.00 is inadequate to compensate him for permanent injuries, expenses, loss of earnings and bodily pain and suffering. The plaintiff-appellant is shown to have been a police officer when injured, earning $195.00 per month, had good health and had served as a police officer for ten years and was 70 years of age. As a result of defendant-appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases