ANFIELD v. LOVE


5 N.J. Super. 347 (1949)

69 A.2d 27

MARY ANFIELD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE F. LOVE, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS ZENITH BUILDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 15, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry W. Decker argued the cause for George F. Love, individually and trading as Zenith Builders, defendant-appellant.

Mr. Henry Sevrin argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Bernard Shurkin, attorney).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

The defendant appeals from the dismissal of his counterclaim against the plaintiff, Mary Anfield, which was granted at the close of the testimony in the Law Division of the Union County Court.

Mary Anfield, as owner, and the defendant entered into a written contract, prepared by the defendant, under which the defendant agreed to furnish certain materials...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases