1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Okla.
  4. 90 Okla.
  5. 90 Okla. Cr. 230 (1949)
 

BYFORD v. STATE

No. A-11040.

90 Okla. Cr. 230 (1949)

212 P.2d 476

BYFORD et al. v. STATE.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

December 7, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.O. Swimmer and Earl E. James, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The defendants, Harold Eugene Byford and George A. McCully, were jointly charged with the possession of intoxicating liquors by information filed in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county. A motion to suppress was filed on behalf of each defendant, but 20 days after filing withdrawn as to Byford. A hearing was had on the motion for McCully, the said defendant testified, and both sides introduced evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases