APPLICATION OF RENSTROM

Patent Appeal No. 5573.

174 F.2d 140 (1949)

Application of RENSTROM.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 12, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cushman, Darby & Cushman, of Washington, D. C. (William M. Cushman and John W. Malley, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (E. L. Reynolds, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and HATFIELD, JACKSON, O'CONNELL, and JOHNSON, Judges.


HATFIELD, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims, Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, in appellant's application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a hair curler.

Claims 1 and 4 are sufficiently illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

"1. A hair curler comprising a tubular body having diametrically opposite...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases