DUENEWALD PRINTING CORP. v. PUTNAM'S SONS


276 A.D. 26 (1949)

Duenewald Printing Corp., Respondent, v. G. P. Putnam's Sons, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 15, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent J. Malone of counsel (John A. Bross with him on the brief; Spence, Hotchkiss, Parker & Duryee, attorneys), for appellant.

Paul Koch of counsel (Harry Zeitlan with him on the brief; Maurice J. Schulkind, attorney), for respondent.

GLENNON, J. P., and CALLAHAN, J., concur with VAN VOORHIS, J.; DORE, J., dissents and votes to affirm in all respects the judgment in plaintiff's favor, in opinion in which COHN, J., concurs.


VAN VOORHIS, J.

Judgment has gone against defendant-appellant upon the decision of the court after a trial without a jury, in an action for work, labor and services in printing. Defendant employed plaintiff to print a book entitled "Beginners Bird Guide", which defendant was under contract to publish for a professor specializing in ornithology in Rutgers University, named Leon Augustus Hausman. Dr. Hausman had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases