1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 5 N.J.
  5. 5 N.J. Super. 290 (1949)
 

PLANT v. RIVER ROAD SERVICE CO.

5 N.J. Super. 290 (1949)

68 A.2d 876

HOWARD M. PLANT, ADOLPH EITEL AND EDWARD CLEMENS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. RIVER ROAD SERVICE CO., A CORPORATION AND WALTER WETMORE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. WALTER WETMORE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HOWARD M. PLANT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CHARLES F. REILLY, DEFENDANT. RIVER ROAD SERVICE CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HOWARD M. PLANT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CHARLES F. REILLY, DEFENDANT. (Appeal Nos. 1, 2, 3)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 2, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Abraham I. Harkavy argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. David Green, attorney).

Mr. John D. Craven argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DONGES, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from judgments of the Superior Court, Law Division, in three separate suits which were consolidated for trial and for appeal. The jury returned verdicts in favor of respondents and against appellant, Plant, and verdicts of no cause of action against appellants, Eitel and Clemens.

The suits arose from a collision between an automobile owned and operated by appellant, Plant, and a truck...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases