CLEEK v. STATE


225 S.W.2d 70 (1949)

CLEEK v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

December 12, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burkett C. McInturff, of Kingsport, for plaintiff in error.

Nat Tipton, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


TOMLINSON, Justice.

The principal question made by Cleek's assignments of error is that "there is no evidence to support the verdict" finding him guilty of "gaming", for which he was assessed a fine of $50.00.

The first of the two counts in the indictment charged Cleek with unlawfully keeping or exhibiting described "devices" for gaming, an act made a misdemeanor by Code Section 11276. The second count charged him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases