FISHKIN v. STEINBERG


5 N.J. Super. 271 (1949)

68 A.2d 840

MORRIS FISHKIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PAUL STEINBERG AND CHARLES LEVINE, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS STEINBERG & LEVINE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 26, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John F. Ryan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Ryan & Saros, attorneys).

Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent (Mr. George D. McLaughlin, attorney).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.


PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, Union County, on the verdict of a jury. The sole ground of appeal is that the jury's verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

We are met at the outset by plaintiff's contention that the defendants are barred from taking an appeal on this ground by Rule 3:59-5, which provides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases