AKREP v. AKREP


1 N.J. 268 (1949)

63 A.2d 253

JOAN EDITH AKREP, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH PATRICK AKREP, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 17, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles Blume argued the cause for petitioner-appellant.

No appearance for defendant-respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

An annulment of an unconsummated marriage is sought by the wife, alleging she was induced to consent to a civil ceremony by fraudulent representations made by the husband that there would thereafter be a religious ceremony.

The parties met while attending night school and agreed to marry in the Catholic church sometime in the month of June 1947, but in April the respondent asked her to go through a civil...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases