COLE v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY


1 N.J. Super. 254 (1949)

64 A.2d 96

EDWARD H. COLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 21, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold J. Sklarew, attorney for the plaintiff-appellant, argued the cause.

Mr. Stephen V.R. Strong argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The sole issue here, and on which plaintiff submitted his case to the First Judicial District Court of the County of Middlesex, sitting without a jury, is "Does the `Railroad Fence Act', R.S. 48:12-46, impose an absolute liability upon the defendant company, under the circumstances here, for the damages suffered by plaintiff in the loss of his cow?" An adverse judgment was rendered against the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases