1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 35 Wn.2d
  5. 35 Wn.2d 213 (1949)
 

HEROUX v. PHARE

No. 31076.

35 Wn.2d 213 (1949)

210 P.2d 1021

EARL J. HEROUX, Appellant, v. CARL E. PHARE et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington.

December 5, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reischling & Lurie, for appellant.

P.R. McIntosh, for respondent McFerran.

PER CURIAM:

A motion has been presented by Edward M. McFerran, one of the respondents, asking that the appeal as to him be dismissed. His motion is based upon two grounds, each of which is disclosed by the record before the court, as follows:

"FIRST: That appellant has failed to comply with Rule 11 of the Rules of the Supreme Court by filing proof of, or written admission of, service of his brief upon this respondent within ninety days after taking of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases