ATANASIO v. SILVERMAN


1 N.J. 245 (1949)

62 A.2d 809

FREDERICK ATANASIO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL W. SILVERMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND HELEN GLUSENKAMP, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 3, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ralph W. Chandless argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant, Helen Glusenkamp (Messrs. Chandless, Weller, Kramer & Frank, attorneys).

Mr. Abraham Natovitz argued the cause for the defendant-respondent, Samuel W. Silverman.


The opinion of the court was delivered by ACKERSON, J.

The pertinent facts involved in the present appeal may be summarized as follows: On January 28, 1946, Frederick Atanasio, recovered a judgment in the above cause against Samuel W. Silverman for $16,763.73. On May 27, 1946, Silverman obtained a rule to show cause why three certain judgments recovered by third parties against Atanasio, in the court below, aggregating approximately $21,900.00, which

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases