1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 194 Md.
  5. 194 Md. 36 (1949)
 

KRAUSS v. LITMAN

[No. 31, October Term, 1949.]

194 Md. 36 (1949)

69 A.2d 781

KRAUSS ET UX. v. LITMAN ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 7, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Hoffenberg for the appellants.

The Court declined to hear argument for the appellees. Submitted on brief by Daniel Ellison for the appellees.

The cause was argued before MARBURY, C.J., DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON, and MARKELL, JJ.

MARBURY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is the second time this case has been before us. In the first appeal, Krauss v. Litman, 189 Md. 394, 56 A.2d 37, the appellees (Litmans) had filed a bill for specific performance of a contract of purchase of the property in question. Mrs. Krauss had not signed the agreement, and her husband, in signing it, was not alleged to have signed for her. We held, therefore, that there was no contract which could...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases