VIEMEISTER v. BD. OF EDUCATION OF PROSPECT PARK


5 N.J. Super. 215 (1949)

68 A.2d 768

EDMUND H. VIEMEISTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF PROSPECT PARK, COUNTY OF PASSAIC AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 18, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Saul R. Alexander argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney).

Mr. Kenneth C. Hand argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Milton A. Feller, attorney).

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, S.J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a decision of the State Board of Education which affirmed the action of the Commissioner of Education in directing the appellant Board of Education to reinstate respondent Edmund H. Viemeister as principal in the school district of Prospect Park.

The respondent was employed as principal in 1937 and thereafter duly acquired tenure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases