It plainly appears that at the time of the "robbery" plaintiffs' messenger or agent was not actually cognizant of the commission of the alleged felonious act as testified; indeed he was not aware of such act. The loss was not by reason of the "robbery" as defined in the policy.
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
