1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 128 (1949)
 

WARRIN CHINA & GLASS CO. v. PEDRICK

88 F.Supp. 128 (1949)

WARRIN CHINA & GLASS CO., Inc. v. PEDRICK.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

November 16, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warner & Birdsall, New York City, J. E. Birdsall, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

John F. X. McGohey, United States Attorney, New York City, John M. Cunneen, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover the sum of $2.00 representing an excise tax alleged to have been illegally and erroneously assessed and collected under Section 2400 of the Internal Revenue Code which was added by Section 552 of the Revenue Act of 1941, effective October 1, 1941, as amended by Section 310 of the Revenue Act of 1943, 26 U.S.C.A. § 2400. It is a test case.

The court makes the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases