RAKOWSKI v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC.


5 N.J. Super. 203 (1949)

68 A.2d 641

MATILDA RAKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nathan Rabinowitz, attorney for and of counsel with plaintiff-appellant, argued the cause (Messrs. Hymen D. Goldberg and Ervan F. Kushner, on the brief).

Mr. Harry E. Walburg argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The dispositive issue raised by plaintiff's appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff, Matilda Rakowski, was twenty-five years of age at the time of her employment by defendant corporation to fluoroscope rubber beltings to determine if there were any defects therein. The X-ray department, where she was employed, consisted of two rooms, one wherein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases