NAT. HOUSE & FARMS ASS'N, INC. v. BD. ADJUSTMENT, OAKLAND


2 N.J. 11 (1949)

65 A.2d 518

NATIONAL HOUSE & FARMS ASS'N, INC., PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 4, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James M. Muth (Messrs. Weber & Muth, attorneys), argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Atwood C. Wolf argued the cause for the respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the former Supreme Court setting aside a resolution of the Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Oakland in the County of Bergen, which resolution denied the application of respondent for a variance from the zoning ordinance of the borough.

The ordinance in question, No. 88, was adopted in 1931. Six years thereafter, in 1937...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases