The respondent determined that petitioners, during the year 1942, realized excessive profits, within the meaning of the Renegotiation Act of 1942, as amended, in the amount of $60,000.
The questions presented are:
(1) Should this proceeding be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under section 403 (e) (2) of the Renegotiation Act of 1943?
(2) Under section 403 (c) (6) of the Renegotiation Act of 1942, as amended, may petitioners' excessive profits be...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
