1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 276 A.D.
  5. 276 A.D. 884 (1949)
 

HONSBERGER v. WILMOT

276 A.D. 884 (1949)

Charles B. Honsberger, Appellant, v. Thomas Wilmot, Respondent William Allen, by George Allen, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Rose K. Honsberger et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 29, 1949.

There was no reversible error committed in the trial of these actions. The actions were in negligence and arose out of a collision between two automobiles. Appellants' counsel cross-examined Wilmot as to his having an operator's license at the time of the trial and developed the fact that he did not have one. Wilmot's counsel brought out the fact that the license was taken away under the motor vehicle law because he was not insured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases