Corroboration of the testimony of plaintiff as to assaults of defendant, his threats, and accusations of her unchastity, was not a prerequisite to a determination in her favor. The court unduly restricted proof at the trial, and its ruling that no proof of general course of conduct could be adduced was erroneous. (9 Carmody on New York Practice, § 267, p. 433; Fisher v. Fisher, 223 App. Div. 19, 22, affd....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
